1917 is an unusual antiwar film that unfurls over two consecutive April days when two ordinary English soldiers are sent on a dangerous mission of mercy in the fierce battleground of northern France. For three years in World War I, the Allied Forces and the Germans have waged grim combat from their trenches. Death and destruction surround the soldiers on both sides, especially in a no-man's land between them.

Dean-Charles Chapman as Blake and George MacKay as Schofield, soldiers crossing no-man's land in 1917.

Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) and Schofield (George MacKay) are ordered by a tough general (Colin Furth) to go on a dangerous mission. The British had thought that the Germans were retreating, but an aerial reconnaissance flight has discovered that they have actually set a trap for the Second Battalion of the Devonshire Regiment. The two lance corporals have only a few hours to traverse nine miles and get orders to Colonel MacKenzie (Benedict Cumberbatch) to cancel their attack before nearly 1,600 troops are massacred. For Blake, this is personal; his brother in the Second Battalion. His companion is less sure about the dangerous mission.

The first segment of 1917 is as chilling, tension-ridden, and scary as any horror film as we watch Blake and Schofield make their way through the filthy, muddy, and smelly Allied trenches. Their trek becomes much more dangerous when they have to cross through the crater-pocked no-man's land where corpses of dead soldiers and horses litter the path. Entering what they had thought were the German front lines they are startled how the land has been pulverized by bombs; nature has been almost obliterated.

A German plane lands near two British soldiers in 1917.

When a German plane is shot down out of the skies, it lands nearly at the two soldiers' feet. They pull the wounded pilot out of the wreckage and are faced with something they are unprepared for. The same thing happens in an encounter with a young German mother (Claire Duburcq) and her little baby after running through a city in flames. A raging river and German snipers create further challenges. These sequences are as griping as any thriller, but they are achieved without special effects.

As he demonstrated most vividly with American Beauty, director Sam Mendes has a gift for taking traditional film genres and sending them into fresh territory. 1917 was filmed to look like it is all shot in one continuous take by cinematographer Roger Deakins. Instead of registering on our senses with raucous noise from bombs, the film sets us down in a war zone where we can meditate in near silence on the barbarity and the death and destruction war brings in its wake.

George MacKay as Schofield running to deliver a life-saving message in 1917.

Eight million people died in World War I. It was a shattering historical event which transformed the manner of war more than any prior war. In a very real sense, it taught the world that if conflicts are to be settled by war, the means they use to do it will be constantly changing. Thus a movie like 1917 gives viewers opportunities to reflect on the face of war and practice empathy with those suffering through it.

GOING FURTHER

In the Trenches

Trench warfare was new during World War I. Previous wars had seen flanks of soldiers charging across the fields at each other. Now they huddled in trenches, lobbing grenades and bombs at the other side, which could be only yards away. Here are two ways to put yourself into the trenches with the soldiers.

  • Trench Slang. Soldiers in the trenches developed their own words to describe the experience. Some of the words later went home with them and became part of the regular lingo. Click here for definitions of a fair whack, basket case, chum, dingbat, muck about, over the top, third man, strafe, zero hour, and more slang.
  • The National Archives in the United Kingdom has published a collection of letters from the trenches. See this pdf for some of them. These first-hand accounts take you right into the trenches so you have a better sense of what the soldiers went through.

New Weapons of War
Military tactics used prior to this war were abandoned or modified with the introduction of machine guns, barbed wire, and accurate artillery. As the years of killing dragged on, the adversaries relied on armored tanks to sweep the countryside, military aircraft to bomb civilians, and even chemical weapons. The Earth itself became collateral damage.

World War I Movies

In our article War Movies for Empathy Practice, written during the American invasion of Iraq, we suggested that people, no matter what their position on a war, practice empathy for those directly involved in it. Veterans tell us that nobody can know what it's like to be in a war without actually being there. But war movies still try to approximate the experience and so are good viewing for empathy practice. Here are three films that take place during World War I.

  • War Horse, directed by Steven Spielberg, is a spellbinding drama about a heroic horse, the young man who loves him, and the hell endured on the battlefields of World War I.
  • Gallipoli, directed by Peter Weir, is a film about an Australian military campaign waged in Turkey during the summer of 1915 which ended in tragedy.
  • All Quiet on the Western Front, directed by Delbert Mann, is based on Erich Maria Remarque's classic World War I novel about a young German soldier who becomes disillusioned with the ideas of patriotism

The Legacy of World War I

World War I was "the first calamity of the 20th century," wrote historian Fritz Stern, " the calamity from which all calamities sprang." Here are a few developments that are part of its legacy.

  • The Permanent War Economy. The United States entered World War I late but benefited greatly from its end. But no one from that era could have guessed how the military would then take over the American economy and impact all areas of the country's life. Henry A. Giroux writes about this in America At War With Itself.
  • America's Warfare Welfare State. The United States has been at war for more years than it has been at peace. In an article in The Nation, Marcus G. Raskin and Gregory D. Squires point out the high moral and financial costs of America's successive wars.
  • New Technological Weapons of War. Just as World War I weapons that had not been used previously, today's wars are employing more and different ways to attack and kill. To learn more about what happening, read our review of Drone Warfare: Killing by Remote Control by Medea Benjamin. See our Spiritual Literacy Blog post Cyberwar Is Now Official. Read our review of Zero Days, an incredibly important documentary directed by Alex Gibney tracing the opening salvos of cyberwarfare which have been shrouded in secrecy. Or watch two movies about drone warfare: Eye in the Sky, an ethical and immersive film about the collateral damage of drone warfare, and Good Kill, a heart-rending drama about drone warfare that proves there never has been, and there never will be, "a good kill."

War Is Not Inevitable

It would seem that people and nations have become resigned to accepting war as the way to solve big conflicts. But there are still some who proclaim that peace must be sought and enacted as an alternative to war. This is the view of Susan Griffin in this excerpt from her essay in Stop the Next War Now edited by Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin. She writes:

"Very few wars have been judged by history as necessary for self-defense.

"To imagine peace is not nearly as sentimental as to think of war as glorious. In modern warfare, more civilians die than soldiers.

"War is not inevitable. The only thing in the universe that is inevitable is change."